Against the Desire for Solipsism
on the advantages, and drawbacks of leading a solipsistic lifestyle
“How selfish soever man may be supposed, there are evidently some principles in his
nature, which interest him in the fortune of others, and render their happiness
necessary to him, though he derives nothing from it except the pleasure of seeing
it.”
— Adam Smith, The Theory of Moral Sentiments
Defining Solipsim
However selfless the actions of an individual seem, as long as they physically, emotionally, or even intangibly offer benefit to self, they cannot be considered such. For an act to be Selfless it must be devoid of self; therefore, only actions which are diametrically opposed to the will of the person performing them can be considered selfless acts. This is not to condemn selfish acts, as I myself believe that self-interest, when correctly aligned, is the highest interest. Take example I, where a mother has the choice between feeding a random child and her own, knowing that one of them will die of starvation. In this situation, it is right that a mother should take interest in feeding her child—an extension of herself—in alignment with her will for preservation of self. The problem with this definition is that it relies on a single solid-state will, when instead will is hierarchical—a taxonomy of priority. Let us take Yeshua at Gethsemane in
The Harm of Excessive Self-Interest
Co-Dependence Requires Selflessness
Closing
Citation
Cited as:
Yotam, Kris. (Aug 2025). Against the Desire for Solipsism. krisyotam.com. https://krisyotam.com/essays/philosophy/against-the-desire-for-solipsism
Or
@article{yotam2025against-the-desire-for-solipsism,
title = "Against the Desire for Solipsism",
author = "Yotam, Kris",
journal = "krisyotam.com",
year = "2025",
month = "Aug",
url = "https://krisyotam.com/essays/philosophy/against-the-desire-for-solipsism"
}