Back to statistics
Directory

Peer Review

28 documents

doc/statistics/peer-review
Are Peerreviews of Grant Proposals Reliable an Analysis of Economic and Social R2020.01.01
certainty: log·importance: 5/10
PDF162.16 KB
Is Scholarly Refereeing Productive at the Margin2020.01.01
certainty: log·importance: 5/10
PDF284.82 KB
Peer Review as an Evolving Response to Organizational Constraint Evidence From S2020.01.01
certainty: log·importance: 5/10
PDF429.48 KB
Low Agreement Among Reviewers Evaluating the Same Nih Grant Applications2018.01.01
certainty: log·importance: 5/10
PDF705.13 KB
Scientific Autonomy Public Accountability and the Rise of Peer Review in the Col2018.01.01
certainty: log·importance: 5/10
PDF192.59 KB
The Sociology of Scientific Validity How Professional Networks Shape Judgement I2018.01.01
certainty: log·importance: 5/10
PDF423.01 KB
Uncertainty and Individual Discretion in Allocating Research Funds2017.01.01
certainty: log·importance: 5/10
PDF687.04 KB
Can Resultsfree Review Reduce Publication Bias the Results and Implications of a2016.01.01
certainty: log·importance: 5/10
PDF683.76 KB
Nyhan2015.01.01
certainty: log·importance: 5/10
PDF268.94 KB
Protocol Review at the Lancet 199720152015.01.01
certainty: log·importance: 5/10
PDF86.44 KB
A Twostep Manuscript Submission Process Can Reduce Publication Bias2013.01.01
certainty: log·importance: 5/10
PDF84.19 KB
Gonzalezalvarez2008.01.01
certainty: log·importance: 5/10
PDF325.36 KB
Is Tenure Justified an Experimental Study of Faculty Beliefs About Tenure Promot2007.01.01
certainty: log·importance: 5/10
PDF580.07 KB
Glymour2005.01.01
certainty: log·importance: 5/10
PDF55.37 KB
We Are Sorry to Inform You2005.01.01
certainty: log·importance: 5/10
PDF243.8 KB
Peer Review for Journals Evidence on Quality Control Fairness and Innovation1997.01.01
certainty: log·importance: 5/10
PDF315.5 KB
How Are the Mighty Fallen Rejected Classic Articles by Leading Economists1994.01.01
certainty: log·importance: 5/10
PDF316.76 KB
The Influence of Prior Beliefs on Scientific Judgments of Evidence Quality1993.01.01
certainty: log·importance: 5/10
PDF651.49 KB
Reviewer Bias1992.01.01
certainty: log·importance: 5/10
PDF201.43 KB
The Philosophical Basis of Peer Review and the Suppression of Innovation1990.01.01
certainty: log·importance: 5/10
PDF280.63 KB
Storynihgrantsprograms1989.01.01
certainty: log·importance: 5/10
PDF13.97 MB
Weiss1989.01.01
certainty: log·importance: 5/10
PDF511.83 KB
Kupfersmid1988.01.01
certainty: log·importance: 5/10
PDF1023.07 KB
Publication Prejudices an Experimental Study of Confirmatory Bias in the Peer Re1977.01.01
certainty: log·importance: 5/10
PDF2.09 MB
Experimenterexpectancyeffects Ch31976.01.01
certainty: log·importance: 5/10
PDF678.69 KB
2 (Johnson, 1975)1975.01.01
certainty: log·importance: 5/10
PDF418.18 KB
Models of Control and Control of Bias1975.01.01
certainty: log·importance: 5/10
PDF1.95 MB
A Proposal for a New Editorial Policy in the Social Sciences1970.01.01
certainty: log·importance: 5/10
PDF959.92 KB

in Naperville, IL
Last visitor from Mitaka, Japan